Subject: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 May 2009 09:15:16 -0500 |
> > > Why does someone wrestle a heavy tripod and a 4x5 camera > > (or maybe even larger) out onto the rocks and not utilize the > > capabilities built into the camera? Furthermore, why did Red Lobster > > pay for it? > Who is to say that it was a 4x5 camera? These days, it's more likely a Digital without any movements. Tilted structures in a high-end landscape is one of my own pet peeves. You have no clue the number of pictures I've tossed/deleted because of that. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OLYMPUS OM ZUIKO LENS SPARE PARTS & GLASS ELEMENTS, Dawid Loubser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |