Subject: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 May 2009 11:29:01 -0400 |
You must have missed the part about it being a 30x40 image with extensive detail in the image. Possibly medium format but I doubt it. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >>> Why does someone wrestle a heavy tripod and a 4x5 camera >>> (or maybe even larger) out onto the rocks and not utilize the >>> capabilities built into the camera? Furthermore, why did Red Lobster >>> pay for it? > > > Who is to say that it was a 4x5 camera? These days, it's more likely a > Digital without any movements. Tilted structures in a high-end landscape is > one of my own pet peeves. You have no clue the number of pictures I've > tossed/deleted because of that. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) High Noon, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |