Subject: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:51:42 +1000 |
> > Read my other post. He lied to you about the Nikon lens. It > is a poor > lens and is 10 years older than the Canon lens. And his pictures do > not really prove anything. I am not saying that there is not an > advantage to a larger format, but neither his images nor his > discussion is enlightening, as usual. > Yeah, if he really wanted to do a reasonable comparison he could have used the same Nikkor on the 5D (with an adapter). ...Wayne ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |