ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pit

Subject:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:33:56 -0700

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> I find it disturbing when we agree! :-)
>   
Yeah, it's a weird week. AG complained about the same thing over on 
Zone-10.com.

He thought the world might be coming to an end if he and I agreed.

Me, I think it's just a random tectonic shift in the force.

Or maybe somebody's having you on.

Moose

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose <= [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] hello, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: hello, Marc Lawrence [OM] Re: hello, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: hello, Jim Couch at home

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: nesting pair, Moose
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Master Problems, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]