ML Archiv: [OM] Re: hello

Subject:	[OM] Re: hello
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:55:58 +1000

May your spondees kick your trochee to death.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 20/04/2008, at 3:57 PM, Marc Lawrence wrote:

> Marc (possibly provoking poetic pedantry)



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] hello, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: hello, Marc Lawrence [OM] Re: hello, Andrew Fildes <= [OM] Re: hello, Jim Couch at home [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Amin Sabet

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Andrew Fildes
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: hello, Marc Lawrence
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: hello, Jim Couch at home
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]