But the point was exquisitely simple. The 5D with its large sensor made
a significantly (not just a little) better image than the smaller sensor
camera even when the smaller sensor camera had one of the best lenses
Nikon offers. That's all. I think the point was made. Calling him
whatever doesn't change the data.
Chuck Norcutt
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> No, other than the logic of looking at same sized 100 percent images
> from two cameras with vastly different lenses and pixel densities and
> his not specifying whether the 10MP or the 12 MP was 43 inches, but
> they were the same size in his samples, I could see that this was not
> going anywhere good. I gave up on him a long time ago. Too many
> times finishing one of his articles I ended up with the conclusion of
> Gertrude Stein on seeing Oakland, California for the first time.
> "There is no there there."
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 4:47 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Do you have any explicit criticism of this specific article. If so
>> I'd
>> be glad to hear it.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|