ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:18:19 -0700

The thought is so mind numbingly unoriginal the choice is whether to  
finish it or to go into a catatonic state.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 6:23 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:

>
> Don't Have Kids


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Leandro DUTRA [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Larry [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]