Subject: | [OM] Re: monopod ? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:43:04 -0400 |
Ah, only 14 ounces and has 4 sections so collapses down to 19". Much more competitive with the Stony Brook I mentioned earlier than the heavier Bogen I use. Any reason you don't use the 3232 or 3229 tilt/swivel heads which are made for monopods? See: <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=details_accessories&A=details&Q=&sku=5498&is=REG&addedTroughValue=314122_REG&addedTroughType=accessory_detail> and <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=details_accessories&A=details&Q=&sku=5491&is=REG&addedTroughValue=314122_REG&addedTroughType=accessory_detail> I don't own one of these either but their praises have been sung here before and inertia is the only reason I don't own one. Chuck Norcutt ALI wrote: > > I use a Manfrotto Digi monopod with Manfrotto 486RC2 ball head. The monopod > alone is relatively inexpensive and very sturdy. Yes it has been used as a > walking stick once or twice. Most importantly, it holds up well with the ZD > 50-200 which is a hefty lens. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: monopod ?, VS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] #149, GeeBee |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: monopod ?, ALI |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: monopod ?, ALI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |