Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)

Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:37:32 -0300

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 28 July, 2005 09:44 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)


>
> Same here, I purchased my 4Ti new in 1991 at less than $600.

Hong Kong dollars ........ wow ! :-))))))

jh


>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx>
>
> >
> > Order of magnitude, with inflation, would  be $20,000+.  The D2X is
$4595.
> > Expensive, yes, but not that far off  from a $1200 OM-4Ti in the 80s
> >
> >
> > To be more accurate, OM 4T's did not reach $1200 until the very late
> > 1990's.
> > I purchased 3 new OM 4 T's in the '90's. Two from Competitive  Camera in
> > Dallas in 1992 for $595.00 each and the third from B& H in  1995 for a
> > little
> > more.
> >
> > Gary Faulkenberry
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz