Subject: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...) |
---|---|
From: | "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:40:12 +0100 |
Tom Scales wrote: >> At what resolution? Most projectors don't seem capable of more than >> 1024x768. > > So? 1024x728 is more than adequate at that size. Why bother with a 12MP camera if you're going to project at less than 1MP? On a 6x4' image that makes each pixel larger than 1/16" across. Even a PC monitor (which I consider still to have poor resolution) has at least 4 times that. Simon ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Film pro goes digi, another E-1 photo, Stephen Scharf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Workshop photos, GeeBee |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Simon Worby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |