Subject: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...) |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:22:34 -0400 |
> > Tom Scales wrote: > >>> At what resolution? Most projectors don't seem capable of more than >>> 1024x768. >> >> So? 1024x728 is more than adequate at that size. > > Why bother with a 12MP camera if you're going to project at less than > 1MP? On a 6x4' image that makes each pixel larger than 1/16" across. > Even a PC monitor (which I consider still to have poor resolution) has > at least 4 times that. > > Simon > Because 12mp isn't for projecting. I didn't project my 35mm either. 12mp is for printing. Wonderfully. Tom ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Workshop photos, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), R. Jackson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), R. Jackson |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), R. Jackson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |