If I only knew...i should have purchased an om 4t in 1995....sigh oh no
better a 3ti..
----- Original Message -----
From: <GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:17 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
>
>
> In a message dated 7/27/2005 5:03:49 PM Central Standard Time,
> tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
>>
>>> Uh, the D2X has interchangeable screens. Which one would you like?
>>
>> Last time we had this discussion, they didn't seem to exist. Or at least
>> not in the "sensible money" range. What does this D2X cost? About an
>> order of magnitude more than a good 4Ti, I'd guess.....?
>
> Order of magnitude, with inflation, would be $20,000+. The D2X is $4595.
> Expensive, yes, but not that far off from a $1200 OM-4Ti in the 80s
>
>
> To be more accurate, OM 4T's did not reach $1200 until the very late
> 1990's.
> I purchased 3 new OM 4 T's in the '90's. Two from Competitive Camera in
> Dallas in 1992 for $595.00 each and the third from B& H in 1995 for a
> little
> more.
>
> Gary Faulkenberry
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|