At 10:25 PM 1/17/2005 +0800, you wrote:
>I don't really understand calculation, but based on dpreview's live test,
>the C8080 8MP (with a tiny 2/3" CCD) won the C*non 300D in resolution.
>
>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc8080wz/page19.asp
>
>It is also no poorer than E-300.
>
>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/page25.asp
>
>May be the different is small to someone but I'm expecting to settle with at
>least 12MP DSLR, based on my experience only at this resolution it can come
>close to slides. And I'm pretty sure the E-1 system will reach this
>resolution within two years.
>
>C.H.Ling
Yeah, I am actually sticking with the C-8080. My interpretation of the
review is that the C-8080 bested the E300. The tests were a bit mismatched
because the C-8080 was shot at ASA 50 and the E300 can go no slower than 100.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|