One other aspect of the E-300 I did not like ...... how to set the lens to
manual focusing if in fact manual focusing is possible. The sales lady
referred to auto focusing only.
John Hudson
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2005 08:24 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Evolt review
>
> Yes, Winsor is right, that is my point. At lowest ISO the noise should not
> influence the resolution of a camera. On the other hand, it is obvious
that
> E-300 has better overall image quality especially at high ISO.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Wilcox" <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Thanks, I think it get it now. The comparison in dpreview between the
> > E300
> > and C-8080 I thought had more to do with resolution, so I was puzzled
that
> > noise popped up as part of the thread. I guess he is implying that
> > comparing the E300 at ASA 100 and C-8080 at 50 is not unfair to the
> > E300. Good to know.
> >
> > Joel W.
> >
> > At 10:41 AM 1/17/2005 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> >>I think that he was just pointing out that noise is a factor of sensor
> >>size. Under ideal, bright conditions there should be little difference
> >>in the images from each of the cameras at the base ISO which is
> >>noiseless. The larger sensor camera will just provide relatively noise
> >>free images under a much wider range of conditions and noise does
> >>interfere with detail.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Winsor
> >>Long Beach, California, USA
> >>On Jan 17, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> >>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|