What is the point you are trying to make about sensor size? It must be
very obvious, but I am missing it.
Joel W.
At 10:49 PM 1/17/2005 +0800, you wrote:
>First, the E-300 has 4 times the sensor size than the C8080. Second, at such
>low ISO I don't think there is any influence on the resolution, if yes
>Olympus would have made the E-300 go down to ISO50.
>
>C.H.Ling
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joel Wilcox" <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >
> > Yeah, I am actually sticking with the C-8080. My interpretation of the
> > review is that the C-8080 bested the E300. The tests were a bit
> > mismatched
> > because the C-8080 was shot at ASA 50 and the E300 can go no slower than
> > 100.
> >
> > Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|