Did not accuse you of lying. I told you why I thought it was not true
and you just repeated an assertion with nothing to back it up.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 15, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Alienspecimen wrote:
>
>
> It is true, I don't lie (unles for money, sex or pleasure...:)
> The 20 D is noisier than the Digital Rebel. The previous generation
> is the generation of the six mp sensors. I don't know anything about
> the 1D Mk II, but it looks like it might be the lone exception (if it
> is...).
> Ciao
> Boris
>
> Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form.
>
> Winsor wrote:
>
>
> That is just not true. The 1D Mk II noise levels are lower than its
> predecessor and the 10D. The 20D noise level is about the same as the
> 10D. It may be generally true, but the entire 8MP generation.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/page20.asp
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
> On Jan 14, 2005, at 5:54 AM, Alienspecimen wrote:
>
>> When it comes to noise, the EVOLT is not unique.
>> According to the reviewers, it seems that the "entire 8MP generation"
>> is much noisier than the previous ones. For once, none of them got it
>> exactly right
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|