Am I right for only lens improvements to suit a full frame sensor ?
A such lens should have a MF's cercle of image so the light rays
stay parallel enough for the 24X36 sensor but with the same resolution
as the present 24X36 lenses so higher than present MF's lenses
including at least a 20mm F2.8 lens ...
So stay apart that I never heard about such a focal length in MF,
what big lenses at incredible prices...
Is this analogy right ?
Regarding the prices we can expect the designers will find another way.
Christian
On Jan 18, 2004, at 10:51 AM, tOM Trottier wrote:
> > Curious. I would have expected a fall-off in light, not a fall-off in
> > resolution, especially with a sensor 1/2 the size of a 35mm frame.
>
> There are many curious things that pop up with digital. It is so
> complex. The usual story is that since a smaller sensor crops of the
> soft edges the picture is improved, but there are instances where
> lenses with middling performance on a reduced size sensor seem to
> blossom into great lenses on a full frame sensors. But these things are
> anecdotal and there are so many things that affect the image that
> besides the gross ones like size that generalizations from comparisons
> are sometimes meaningless.
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California
> USA
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|