I'll have to disagree in a major way with the implication that MF
lenses are inferior to 35mm lenses in resolution. I've got some
of the best of the Zuikos -- 50/2 Macro, 90/2 Macro, 100/2, etc.,
etc. -- and I wouldn't hesitate to cut a 24x36mm piece out of any
6x9cm tranny or negative shot with one of my Zeiss Planars or
Schneider Symmars and compare it head-to-head with an equivalent
Zuiko shot (or any other 35mm lens, for that matter).
Walt, getting defensive about the good stuff.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The more you read and observe about this politics thing, you got
to admit that each party is worse than the other. The one that's
out always looks the best. -- Will Rogers
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: christian <fischerchristian@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:45:41 +0100
>A such lens should have a MF's cercle of image so the light rays
>stay parallel enough for the 24X36 sensor but with the same
>resolution as the present 24X36 lenses so higher than present
>MF's lenses including at least a 20mm F2.8 lens ...
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|