Hello Walt and all,
I believe your experience about the exceptional resolution of these MF lenses.
But what about most of MF lenses ?
I would apologize if my opinion if wrong.
Christian
Le Dimanche 18 Janvier 2004 22:42, vous avez écrit :
> I'll have to disagree in a major way with the implication that MF
> lenses are inferior to 35mm lenses in resolution. I've got some
> of the best of the Zuikos -- 50/2 Macro, 90/2 Macro, 100/2, etc.,
> etc. -- and I wouldn't hesitate to cut a 24x36mm piece out of any
> 6x9cm tranny or negative shot with one of my Zeiss Planars or
> Schneider Symmars and compare it head-to-head with an equivalent
> Zuiko shot (or any other 35mm lens, for that matter).
>
> Walt, getting defensive about the good stuff.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The more you read and observe about this politics thing, you got
> to admit that each party is worse than the other. The one that's
> out always looks the best. -- Will Rogers
>
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: christian <fischerchristian@xxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:45:41 +0100
>
> >A such lens should have a MF's cercle of image so the light rays
> >stay parallel enough for the 24X36 sensor but with the same
> >resolution as the present 24X36 lenses so higher than present
> >MF's lenses including at least a 20mm F2.8 lens ...
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|