Well, I have to admit that I've never eaten it or photographed it either.
People I know that have eaten it tell interesting stories though. My
relatives in Scotland ran a place called the McClellan Inn. I wonder if they
served it. /jim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Earl Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:25 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: "Real World Tests"
You are skirtin' the line, Laddie.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 1/1/2004 at 1:00 AM James N. McBride wrote:
>Almost everything is better than Haggis.......
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gordon J. Ross
>Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 6:17 PM
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [OM] Re: "Real World Tests"
>
>
>Aussie sandwich spread. Its better than Haggis.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 2:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [OM] Re: "Real World Tests"
>
>
>> What's Vegemite?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Mickey Trageser
>> Sent: 31 December 2003 04:44
>> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [OM] Re: "Real World Tests"
>>
>> You can tell the predefined focus of this group just by looking at the
>> default prefix in the subject line: [OM]. Anything else isn't [OM] and is
>> therefore some form of [OT] off topic. [FS] being an example.
>>
>> At any rate, this list does have a long running history of being OM
>> centered. It was set up specifically for OM discussion. We have some
>serious
>> [OT] threads that sometimes go on to the detriment of the group. I can't
>> claim fame for some of the worst, but I'm not innocent either. Ah,
>Vegemite,
>> I remember it well..... and of course the current offshoot of the battery
>> discussion.
>>
>> So, without much muss or fuss, I think the default subject prefix spells
>it
>> out clearly. We aren't tightly monitored, so it's mostly a self policing
>> situation. We've managed this long, I think we can still do it, shall we?
>>
>> I'll go away now and let us get back to OM talk. Anyone want to buy a
>> mechanically great OM-2?
>>
>> Best to all.
>> Mickey
>>
>>
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|