Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3

Subject: Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3
From: VS <VS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 13:14:06 +1000
In the message I received, iwert writes:

Sorry Iwert, not an -1 user. :-)

>If there are any users of OM3's and 1's, what is your viewfinder experience?
>The 3 indicates shutter speed, which I think is very convenient.
>The 1 is bigger, and very sleek and simple, but lacks illumination.

What you see in the viewfinder in -3(Ti) is just the same as in -4(Ti)
in manual mode. 

>And then, do the plain 3's have the same battery ptoblem as the plain 4's?

No. :-)

Are you trying to convince yourself that you need an OM-3(Ti) and need
list's input that it's OK to have one and that you really need one? Of
course you do. ;-) Get both, plain -3 and the titanium one. If you
usually shoot without flash, you won't notice much difference between
them anyway. ;-)

Cheers,

Saso
 - An OM-3 user; 4Ti is for girls (my better half has it)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz