iwert wrote:
BTW, are there any other users who observed the following: In my subjective
feeling, I can easily use an OM1 or 2 + 40mm at 1/30 freehand, however I
have the feeling I am getting more unscharp(er) shots with the OM4 (and 3?).
Could this be because of the double mirror?
The double mirror doesn't inherently have any effect on sharpness. If
your OM-4 shots were consistently less sharp, it might be that the
mirror is out of adjustment, which can happen to any SLR
If there is no difference at faster shutter speeds, it seems likely that
either your holding/shooting technique with the two different shutter
release styles differs enough to make a difference or it is random
results from doing something difficult. I know lots of people claim to
be able to hand-hold speeds below 1/60 sec. successfully. I know that I
have done so, especially with cameras with tiny shutter mechanisms and
soft releases, like the XA. On the other hand, I believe that there are
VERY few people who can hand hold an SLR at 1/30 or below CONSISTENTLY,
shot after shot. Unless you've done a lot of testing, you could be
looking at that kind of variability.
I recently took shots of Tule Elk with a zoom at its 200mm limit. Light
and film speed were such that 1/125 to 1/250 wide open was the best I
could do. Standing in a stiff, gusty breeze, I took 7-8 shots as
carefully as I could. A couple came out sharp, the rest not. I think any
shot below 1/60 has similar problems. Maybe the ratio will be different,
but some will not be sharp.
And then, do the plain 3's have the same battery ptoblem as the plain 4's?
Yes
Moose
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|