Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?

Subject: Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?
From: Per Öhström <poo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 23:55:14 +0100
I've never photographed a baptism, but I do have and use two Zuiko zooms
extensively - the 35-105 and the 65-200. I've never thought of them as too 
dark to focus, but sometimes too slow to hold still, especially the 65-200.
The obvious solution is a monopod. (Or a tripod, which of course is even 
better but more difficult to move around quickly.) I think both are very 
good lenses, but the 65-200 really has the edge. A wonderful zoom lens with 
a really good macro feature @ 200 mm. It all depends on how close you can get
but if I wouldn't know in advance I would stake my bet on the 65-200, since
it probably would be easier to keep a distance than to push towards the
center of the action. On the other hand, the 35-105 is definitely more of 
an allrounder and probably the lens I use the most (possibly with the
exception
of the 24mm f/2.8).

So, no obvious advice, but just a few confusing thoughts from me.

Good luck!
Per 

At 15:02 2003-02-08 -0500, derek fong wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I plan to take pictures of my niece's baptism in a few weeks and am 
>using that as an excuse to get another Zuiko.  I currently have a 
>28/2.8 and a 50/1.8, but am considering a zoom lens (maybe a 
>35-105/3.5-4.5) because I have no idea how close or how far I will be 
>from the "action".  I'd obviously like to be able to get some practical 
>use out of the lens after the baptism, and since I don't currently have 
>a telephoto lens, I figured a zoom lens was the best way to go (in 
>terms of having a good, everyday lens mounted to my OM-2 most of the 
>time).  Still, I'm not sure how the lighting will be in this particular 
>situation, so I'm a little hesitant about the zoom lens because of some 
>of the previous posts I've read about the viewfinder being too dark for 
>focusing.  I'm also considering a 35-70/3.5-4.5, although I fear that I 
>might not like the shorter zoom range.  Still, it's cheaper and smaller 
>than the 35-105.
>
>Can anyone offer some suggestions?  I'm not completely opposed to just 
>getting another prime lens, but like I said, I'd prefer to take the 
>opportunity to get a good all-purpose lens, which might mean a zoom 
>lens of some sort.
>
>-f
>
>
>-- 
>Derek Fong
>Web Application Developer
>subtitle designs inc. <http://www.subtitled.com/>
>
>"Mistakes are the portals of discovery." --James Joyce
>    >> GPG key/fingerprint available upon request <<
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz