Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?

Subject: Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?
From: derek fong <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 11:16:40 -0500
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Per Öhström wrote:

I've never photographed a baptism, but I do have and use two Zuiko zooms extensively - the 35-105 and the 65-200. I've never thought of them as too dark to focus, but sometimes too slow to hold still, especially the 65-200. The obvious solution is a monopod. (Or a tripod, which of course is even better but more difficult to move around quickly.) I think both are very good lenses, but the 65-200 really has the edge. A wonderful zoom lens with a really good macro feature @ 200 mm. It all depends on how close you can get but if I wouldn't know in advance I would stake my bet on the 65-200, since
it probably would be easier to keep a distance than to push towards the
center of the action. On the other hand, the 35-105 is definitely more of
an allrounder and probably the lens I use the most (possibly with the
exception
of the 24mm f/2.8).

Hi,

Well, first off, thanks to all for the great suggestions! They have been very helpful, and I am now re-evaluating the "situation".

I originally thought that since I already have a 28/2.8, my best bet would be to get a telephoto lens of some sort (I was thinking either 85 or 100mm) to shoot this event. My reasoning for this was so that I could either take some portrait photos (before and after the baptism) or get in close if I end up being too far to get decent shots with my 50/1.8. However, I am now considering getting a 35 or 100 (the 85/2 is, unfortunately, too expensive for me). I think some good arguments have been made to keep me away from buying and using a zoom lens for this particular event (even though it would be a good thing to have as an all-purpose lens later).

Like I said, though, I'm now torn by whether I should get something at the short or long end. I can see the rationales for going either way, but I'm thinking (personally) that maybe something at the telephoto end would be more practical for me after the baptism since I already have the wide and normal end of the spectrum covered. That was part of the reason I was originally considering a zoom lens, but if I won't be able to use my new "toy" for the baptism, then I just can't justify getting a new lens right now...

Any thoughts? My budget is roughly US$180, so I'm thinking I can afford either a 35/2.8 or a 100/2.8 from KEH, but not both. :(

-f


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz