| Subject: | Re: Re: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t |
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:18:51 +1000 |
> Tim Chakravorty <suchismit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am sorry to hear that, but how did it die ? > Probably died of disappointment because the photograph didn't have the "leica glow". Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t, Wayne Harridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Using wide angle lenes?, Tal Lancaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t, Wayne Harridge |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |