Subject: | Re: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t |
---|---|
From: | dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 12 Oct 2002 16:47:26 -0700 |
Roger D. Key wrote: That's been my solution. I have one 4Ti and two OM-4 bodies that have the Ti circuit. I figure at least one of them probably has newer electronics than the 'real' Ti. The other issue is how heavily used the body is. Both of mine are in good enough interior and exterior cosmetic conditoin that I don't believe they have been heavily used; one should check.A good compromise could be an OM-4 with an OM-4Ti circuit board. <> I've assumed one could buy a defunct 4T(i), swap tops, connect up the appropriate wires and have Super FP on a circuit converted plain '4' body.Of course you do not get the Super FP flash option, but otherwise it is the same as the 4Ti. Moose < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Army Surplus (Was Rolls Royce Griffon & Hydroplane Pics), Scott Gomez |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] ( OM ) The Man-made image, Brian Swale |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t, Roger D. Key |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM4 vs. OM4t, Roger D. Key |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |