Hi,
I have been a visitor to this group for a while now, and have learned quite a
bit about Olympus equipment from the posts. I became interested in the OM
system after reading about the OM1 and OM2 on the Photography in Malaysia
website, (http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/photography.htm). Then I
bought an OM1 and 3 lenses from a seller on photo.net, and found that I
really like it. Recently bought some other lenses and an OM2 as well.
Anyway, I think would really like an OM4t. Why? Because I want to have the
diopter adjustment, and also the ISO setting up to 3200, rather than only
1600. I also think the LCD viewfinder readout would be an advantage,
especially in low light. My question is this: Is it worth paying the extra
money for an OM4t rather than an OM4?
My impulse is to go for the OM4t because it is a more recent camera. (I want
the black OM4t, not the older champagne version).
I'd appreciate hearing what those of you who have owned both have to say
about them.
Thanks.
John Meyers
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|