Subject: | [OM] A good tripod? |
---|---|
From: | "pirjol" <pirjol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:53:06 +0100 |
It seems everybody when mentioning tripods, don't forget to use the word "good". Why does it always have to be a *good* tripod? Why can't I use a cheap plastic tripod? (which is also much lighter) Isn't it just a thing where you put your camera, so it doesn't shake when you take the picture? What is the big deal? Am I missing something? [cris] < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Dorothée Rapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Dorothée Rapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] MD1 and 35F2, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A good tripod?, John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |