If "He who dies with the most toys wins" is valid logic, then one must die
to win. /jnm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of ClassicVW@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:03 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] second body
>
>
> May I respectfully point out that your logic is indeed fine from
> a practical
> standpoint, but logic is often thrown out the window when we feel
> the need to
> feed our addiction! It's like this- I own a motorcycle. If I felt
> the "need"
> or desire to get a second one, I sure as heck wouldn't buy the exact same
> brand/model/color, would I? No, I'd get something different that filled a
> different "need" in my psyche. We "need" our OMs, I'm sure. But
> they're also
> our "toys". He who dies with the most toys wins!
>
> Best,
> George S.
>
> kamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Given that the starter of this thread has been using an OM-1n as his
> primary
> camera, I guess he is doing well without auto this and that.
> Why should he
> need a auto everyting or auto something second body? Also, if
> one continues
> to use the OM-1n as the primary body, chance is that the
> battery-dependent
> second body will fail him when needed. I cannot see nothing
> better than the
> OM-1(n) as a second body.
> >>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|