May I respectfully point out that your logic is indeed fine from a practical
standpoint, but logic is often thrown out the window when we feel the need to
feed our addiction! It's like this- I own a motorcycle. If I felt the "need"
or desire to get a second one, I sure as heck wouldn't buy the exact same
brand/model/color, would I? No, I'd get something different that filled a
different "need" in my psyche. We "need" our OMs, I'm sure. But they're also
our "toys". He who dies with the most toys wins!
Best,
George S.
kamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< Given that the starter of this thread has been using an OM-1n as his
primary
camera, I guess he is doing well without auto this and that. Why should he
need a auto everyting or auto something second body? Also, if one continues
to use the OM-1n as the primary body, chance is that the battery-dependent
second body will fail him when needed. I cannot see nothing better than the
OM-1(n) as a second body.
>>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|