On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Giles wrote:
>Acer V wrote:
>
>> Allrighty, this just occured to me, and I have no time to loose: I need to
>> take interior architecture photos, most of which will be done with the
>> 28mm f/3.5 G.Zuiko. Results need to be blown up to 8*10 or 11*14; shooting
>
>It probably wont be wide enough so panic now ;-)
No kiddin'
>I always found this with 28mm. 24mm is much better.
>
>> though? 50/1.8MC ser. 2.33M, f/1.4MC ser. 859???, or f/3.5MC macro? With
>> Or to put it in bottom line: 50/1.8MC or 50/3.5 macro? Will the increase
>
>The macro
Per Reese Lenstests, the macro sharpness falls off midaperture...is there
something I'm missing?
>> Thanks in advance; too bad I don't have a 35/shift :/
>
>No, too bad you don't have the 24/shift ;-)
I actually got offered the 35/shift by a neighbor listmember, but golly,
that's a HUGE responsibility, something I can live without...besides, it's
only for a class ;-)
/Acer V
--
goosnargh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|