Allrighty, this just occured to me, and I have no time to loose: I need to
take interior architecture photos, most of which will be done with the
28mm f/3.5 G.Zuiko. Results need to be blown up to 8*10 or 11*14; shooting
Tri-X (400). Obviously I want to maximize DOF, but at the same time I
don't want to get bummed by diffraction. The 28 I'll shoot at f/16 or 11
if I can get away.
However, for some shots, I'll use the 50mm lens--which one
though? 50/1.8MC ser. 2.33M, f/1.4MC ser. 859???, or f/3.5MC macro? With
the macro, I can go down to f/22, but will that cause lots of
diffraction--limited loss at 8*10 or 11*14?
Or to put it in bottom line: 50/1.8MC or 50/3.5 macro? Will the increase
in DOF (f/16 vs f/22) be worth it or not at 8*10 size?
Thanks in advance; too bad I don't have a 35/shift :/
/Acer V
--
goosnargh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|