On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Windrim, Brian wrote:
>Hi Acer,
>
>you asked:
>
><SNIP>
>>> Or to put it in bottom line: 50/1.8MC or 50/3.5 macro? Will the increase
>>> in DOF (f/16 vs f/22) be worth it or not at 8*10 size?
>
>Can I turn this around and suggest that you use *both* and then *tell us*
>which was more successful?
>
>Since you'll be working with a static subject and (presumably) a tripod,
>swapping 50s shouldn't be too much of a chore, and since you'll be doing
>your own printing you're ideally placed to assess the results.
>
>Actually I would suggest trying 3 combinations:
>
>50/1.8 @ f16
>50/3.5 @ f16
>50/3.5 @ f22
>
>just be sure to keep notes about the order of the exposures on the film! :-)
Indeed.
/Acer V
--
goosnargh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|