Chris;
Right, I see we were talking about 2 diff things.
Your star shots were at F/8? On what film?
George
>"George M. Anderson" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the
'Net and spake thusly:
>
>> > Stars are a point source---f/stop is irrelevant
>>
>> Have to disagree. F/stop very relelvant due to lens imperfections at
>> wide open apertures.
>
>Allow me to rephrase.
>
>"When calculating exposure, the usual relationship of f/stop to
>exposure does not apply. For normal images, a 300mm lens at, say, f/4
>and a 28mm lens also at f/4 give the same exposure. For point sources
>this is not the case---exposure is proportional to diameter of
>aperture, rather than ratio of focal-length-to-aperture-diameter."
>
>Concern for minimal aberration is why I shot my starfield slides at
>f/8 rather than wide-open f/2.5.
>
>cjb
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|