Subject: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos |
---|---|
From: | Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Sep 1999 17:18:26 -0700 (PDT) |
>>>But both a slide and a negative will hold more tonal range than can be printed. So the decision as to what part of the tonal range is to be printed has to be made by someone.<<< Even for Cibas? /Acer "steppenwolf" Victoria -- "Step by step / Easy and slow / On the stairway to heaven / What a way to go / ... " --Def Leppard < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OM2000 vs OM3, Harrisons |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos and neg scanning, Acer Victoria |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Christopher Biggs |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Christopher Biggs |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |