Subject: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos |
---|---|
From: | Christopher Biggs <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 06 Sep 1999 12:12:18 +1000 |
Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly: > >>>But both a slide and a negative will hold more tonal range than can be > printed. So the decision as to what part of the tonal range is to be > printed has to be made by someone.<<< > > Even for Cibas? Especially so. The some of the best cibacrome prints you will see involved making a "contrast mask" (basically a thin monochrome negative) which is sandwiched with the slide when exposing the print. cjb -- __ / \ / \ /MORONS\ / \ \ next / \ 15 / \msgs/ \__/ || || ||chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx One more infobahn cliche couldn't hurt... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Looking for tripod advice, Acer Victoria |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2000 vs OM3, ALEXSCIFI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | print latitude was Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Acer Victoria |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |