Subject: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos |
---|---|
From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:03:44 +0000 |
My ADITL roll was printed uncorrected by a Fuji minilab in a Chemist. I asked for no colour or exposure correction and got it. Giles Christopher Biggs wrote: > The "uncorrected" print is a myth, IMAO. > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: Sv: [OM] Slide projector sizing?, Hans van Veluwen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] updated FS list, Jan Decher |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos and neg scanning, Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, George M. Anderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |