Subject: | Re: [OM] Tamron Lens |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:20:47 -0000 |
I recall that Walt Wayman waxed lyrical about the 35-105, which I also had for a while. It was a much later vintage than the lenses covered on adaptall-2.com, possibly based on an AF design, with cosmetics that bear no relation to the earlier SP lenses. Piers -----Original Message----- From: olympus <olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Mike Gordon via olympus Sent: 24 March 2020 22:30 To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: usher99@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron Lens Looks quite good. There is a 38-80 too. http://www.adaptall-2.com/lenses/01A.html I wonder why the 35-105 /2.8 isn't listed????? (which is the 65A) Where is it? http://www.adaptall-2.com/ I still use it on occasion. Only major gripe is the corners on the short end due to off axis astigmatism. I usually have the 35 shift with me and a macro lens as well. Marnie liked it for awhile Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] How Wide is Wide? [was New Sonie lens 20/1.8], Wayne Shumaker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Restaurant Sculptures [was Not more flower pix], Philippe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron Lens, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron Lens, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |