Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:55:28 +0000 (UTC) |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
<<<Macro lens is a complicated thing for µ4/3. Wonderful post by Moose. The PL 100-400 with the Pentax T132 achromatic CU diopter is a killer kit for flutterbys. It can even resolve the scales shooting small critters at 1:1 but not in my hands at 400mm. I did not do formal testing and there are a slew of variables but 250ish mm seems to work better-- based on review of images only. The MZ 12-100 is a nice lens and does the sync IS with the Em1 MK2 and is very well weather sealed but not great for macro. I bought the Sigma diopter for a steal thanks to a link from Moose and it does work well on the 12-100 (unlike the T132) but the working distance is a tad short. MFT could use a very nice loooong FL macro lens but there are other options. Skittish critter chaser, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Philippe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |