Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:36:23 -0800 |
> From: Piers Hemy <piers.hemy@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:piers.hemy@xxxxxxxxx>> > > Why do you say that [the SWD version of the 50-200 is better], Jan? I have > always understoid that the glass is common to both, so I assume that the SWD > enable faster focus. Much faster?? I don’t think the “glass is common.” As I recall, they did some twiddling inside. But my understanding is that the focus is MUCH faster. Mind you, I’ve never had or used the non-SWD version. Jan -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG : Camouflage in the Fall, Charles Geilfuss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 mk III, Jan Steinman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |