AG writes:
>>When looking at pictures, you usually say to yourself "that was taken
>>with a long telephoto lens." Or, "that was taken with a wide-angle
>>lens". What I like about the 24/2.8 and the 28/2 is that they don't
>>tip their hand. These Zuiko wide-angle lenses just make the image look
>>like it was taken with a normal lens, but with a greater field of
>>view.
I don't understand this. The FL per se should be the major factor.
That be said there is something about many shots especially sky
predominant with the 24/2.8
that are just nice---rendering is "better" than the Canyon 24-105. I
have no clue why that is,
but it is best to leave any residual linear distortion alone.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|