On 6/25/2013 7:42 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> If the images don't look right, is it, in fact, 'awesome', other than in
>> price?
> It's a case of picking your poison. You can have a lens which is so
> well corrected that it is perfectly flat-fielded, but the bokeh makes
> you hurl. Or a lens which has perfect bokeh, but you've got a 10%
> focusing error between center and corner.
Like the Z. 21/3.5 close-up, where it has lots of field curvature.
> What I personally dislike about this particular lens is that it is
> nearly technically perfect, but lacks the ability to maintain a
> natural "transparant" look in all uses. I account this to the
> aspherical elements. Aspherical elements are good in many ways and
> uses, but not in ALL ways and uses. When you get OOF highlights
> folding in on themselves, that's not good.
Lots of words, but I think it all boils down to "Not awesome, overall, for
actual use."
Involuted Bokeh Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|