So, why didn't she take a picture of you and your gear for posterity?
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/21/2013 5:34 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> AG writes:
>
>>> My current harem consists of the 35-80/2.8, 24/2.8, 28/2, 35/2.8,
>>> 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 100/2.8, 100/2, 200/4, 300/4.5 and a selection of nice
>>> bodies.
>
> Yeh, don't dimiss the lowly diminutive 24/2.8. It can hold its own with
> the big boys.
>
> To quote the 16-9 site:
>
> "The bald tally doesn't also tell the story of how the Olympus and
> Nikon compare. The Olympus is astoundingly good at f5.6-8 at distance,
> and produced the highest resolution captures of anything shot thus far
> at 24mm. "
>
> snip: " We should also mention that the stellar little Olympus 24mm
> thrashed every other lens it encountered in the group stages of the
> 24mm World Cup, can be bought used for less than a decent filter for
> the 24L, and fits in the palm of your hand with room to spare. It's a
> gem." (see "conclusion" for the Final test)
>
> http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/24mmcup/final/24mm_final1.html
>
> I had a mint copy with the metal hood mounted on my minty black 4T on a
> tripod in the Azores at a stunning overlook and Marnie broke my trance:
> "Are you going to stand there and admire your gear or are you going to
> take a picture?"
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|