| Subject: | Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2? |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:39:10 -0700 |
> ...but it is best to leave any residual linear distortion alone. Yeah, what's the point. By the time you crop after distortion correction you're back to the fov of the lens you shoulda used in the first place. But hey, maybe that's OK too. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Apartment Storefront in Ida, Michigan, Chris Crawford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 report, Jim Nichols |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Nothing to do with the 21/2 [was Just how good is the 21mm f2?], Moose |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?, philippe.amard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |