Subject: | Re: [OM] Early impressions |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:14:18 -0500 |
Without a doubt. I did understand that fully once I read it. My only quibble was about saturation of the sensor relative to large and small pixels. Chuck Norcutt On 12/2/2012 10:56 PM, Moose wrote: > Have I managed to turn it around so you might consider the difference between > 'sensor ISO' and 'camera ISO' in DXO's > measurements to be a good thing?;-) > > Change-up Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OMD-EM-5 offer, Brian Gray |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] UNX-9120 Grip for E-M5, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, Johnie Stafford |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |