On 12/1/2012 10:40 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Chuck was interested in the OM-D comparison to the 5D classic. The
> measurements by DXO are interesting.
> As they measure it the DR at lower ISO's is actually better--quite an
> achievement. Hit on "measurements" in the comparison chart then "DR"
> The noise is lower at all ISO's on the 5D (but not by much) and the gap
> widens a tad as expected at higher ISO's.
I don't read DXO, but that sounds a bit contradictory. In DPR's DR tests, noise
defines the bottom, so lower noise tends
to mean greater DR.
But how the heck do you compare noise on different size sensors?
> Perhaps Moose has confirmed this with real world
> comparisons but suspect he has been too busy with other things.
No point. I'm not going back. Why spend time on tests that won't change
anything?
> The sensor is better than every Canyon APS-C--
Sounds right to me. Better certainly than the 7D/60D/3Ti.
> they had better get off their duff.
Don't matter to me. ;-)
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|