Subject: | [OM] Early impressions |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 1 Dec 2012 13:40:34 -0500 (EST) |
Chuck was interested in the OM-D comparison to the 5D classic. The measurements by DXO are interesting. As they measure it the DR at lower ISO's is actually better--quite an achievement. Hit on "measurements" in the comparison chart then "DR" The noise is lower at all ISO's on the 5D (but not by much) and the gap widens a tad as expected at higher ISO's. Perhaps Moose has confirmed this with real world comparisons but suspect he has been too busy with other things. The sensor is better than every Canyon APS-C--they had better get off there duff. http://tinyurl.com/d7lrz25 When is the next big sale, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] [OT]Global warming, was: Air-source Heat Pump?, Brian Gray |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Question for those who have actually handled an E-M, Martin Walters |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, SwissPace |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |