Subject: | Re: [OM] Early impressions |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 1 Dec 2012 15:22:34 -0500 (EST) |
No Matter Moose writes: >>>>But how the heck do you compare noise on different size sensors? How DXO measures and reports SNR: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Insights/Noise-characterization They only give the "normalized" results on the DXO mark site: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Insights/Detailed-computation-of-DxOMark-Sensor-normalization >> Perhaps Moose has confirmed this with real world >>comparisons but suspect he has been too busy with other things. >>>>>No point. I'm not going back. Why spend time on tests that won't change >>>>anything? Well, curiosity and you have the 5D--I bet in some situations the 5D classic given its unique rendering qualities and large photo-wells would outperform the OM-D. I still like having FF digital film for my OM lenses as a choice. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Colorless Moose?, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: If you can see it, philippe . amard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Early impressions, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |