If it is marketing, then it is an outright, damnable lie, since Epson
claims 6400 optical.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=647187&Q=&is=REG&A=details
I have no reason to doubt your experience, but how how how could they do
that? (I tend to find no difference between 3200 and 6400 other than a
really annoying file size.)
Joel W.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012, at 08:57 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> No, the Epson does not by any stretch of the imagination achieve
> 6400DPI, it's purely marketing baloney. I use a V700, and both my (and
> countless others') experience will attest that there is no real
> additional information extracted (i.e. no difference from a 3200DPI file
> uprezzed - and that's if you're lucky, it's more like 2400DPI).
>
> Still nice scanners (especially for the price) though... I have not
> heard anything of the new scanner you linked to, might be interesting
> indeed.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|