Regardless, ultravioleta looks mighty good to me.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/3/2012 7:26 PM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Don,
>
> Never for flowers?, I found it suitable even for portraits :)
>
> Hope I didn't show this one here before, and if I did I hope you don't
> remember it.
> The spyderweb shines inside this flower.
> Aperture was f8, bokeh is far better in the film original, I messed up
> something I don't recall during postprocessing that turned a harsh the
> oof background - certainly Curves.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/5749572584/in/photostream/lightbox/
>
> I'm rather sure I didn't show this other one here before, tell me if I
> did please.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/5946556365/in/photostream/lightbox/
>
> Fernando.
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Moose<olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Well, the 135/4.5 is an excellent lens.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|